From: <Saved by Windows Internet Explorer 7>
Subject: Wednesday Weather Topic in Greater Depth
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:02:19 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: http://www.ametsoc.org/amsedu/online/archive/course/09_fall/f09w04w_sup.html
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Wednesday Weather Topic in Greater Depth</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16809" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY vLink=3D#800080 link=3D#0000ff>
<H2 align=3Dcenter>SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION...IN GREATER DEPTH</H2>
<H4 align=3Dcenter>To complement the Daily Summary for Wednesday, 30 =
September=20
2009</H4>
<H3 align=3Dcenter>MONITORING DEGREE DAY UNITS</H3>
<HR>

<P>A familiar gauge used to assess a winter's severity is the amount of =
heating=20
fuel that we need to use to keep our homes warm over the winter. In =
other words,=20
during the next several months many of us will inquire as to how the =
winter of=20
2009-2010 has affected our pocket books when it comes to space heating. =
For=20
comparison purposes, we may try to remember how this winter compares =
with last=20
winter or to some long-term average. We can monitor this situation by =
regularly=20
returning to the tabulations of heating degree-day units. </P>
<P>The heating degree-day unit has been a useful indicator that gauges =
the=20
amount of energy required for space heating. During the first several =
days of=20
each new month, the Climate Analysis Center of the National Weather =
Service=20
compiles heating degree data for the previous month and posts these data =
for <A=20
href=3D"http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/de=
gree_days/mctyhddy.txt">selected=20
cities </A>around the country. Since the statistics for September are =
yet to be=20
processed, those statistics for August will serve as an example. The =
number of=20
heating degree-day units accumulated for the month appears in the column =
marked=20
"Monthly Total". Adjoining columns display the comparisons between this =
year and=20
the "normals", as well as with last year. Specifically, the arithmetic=20
differences between the month totals from this year and the "normals"=20
representing the 30-year averages for the current 1971-2000 =
climatological=20
reference interval appear in the column marked "Month. Dev. from Norm." =
The=20
difference between this year and the same month last year appear in the =
column=20
"Month. Dev. from L. YR." Similar columns show the comparisons between =
the total=20
number of heating degree day units accumulated over the current heating =
season=20
that started on 1 July and the corresponding values for normals-to-date =
and last=20
season-to-date. Percentage differences are also presented. </P>
<P>The climatologists at the Climate Analysis Center have also prepared =
a=20
corresponding list of <A=20
href=3D"http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/de=
gree_days/msahddy.txt">population-weighted=20
</A>heating degree-day units for each state. These latter statistics are =
used to=20
show the temperature-related energy consumption on the state, regional, =
and=20
national levels. </P>
<P>Since the heating season was only 2 months old for the provided table =
and=20
most locales have not experienced daily average temperatures =
significantly below=20
65 degrees Fahrenheit, analysis of these statistics is somewhat =
premature. A=20
more meaningful analysis could be made by revisiting this site in =
several months=20
as winter begins in earnest across many portions of the country. The =
preliminary=20
results through August indicate that nationally, slightly more heating=20
degree-day units had been accumulated for the season (since 1 July) than =
the=20
30-year "normal". The New England and the eastern South Central States, =
along=20
with the North Central States (eastern and western) had higher =
accumulated=20
totals than average in July and August 2009. Elsewhere, fewer heating =
degree-day=20
units were accumulated. In addition, most of the regions of the =
continental=20
United States had more heating degree-day units that have been =
accumulated this=20
summer as compared with the first two months of the previous 200 8-2009 =
heating=20
season. </P>
<P>Corresponding sets of cooling degree-day units for <A=20
href=3D"http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/de=
gree_days/mctycddy.txt">selected=20
cities </A>and for <A=20
href=3D"http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/de=
gree_days/msacddy.txt">population-weighted=20
</A>regions were also compiled. These statistics indicate that despite a =
cool=20
summer across the Northeast and the Midwest, the entire country =
experienced more=20
cooling degree-day units for the first eight months of the year than the =
30-year=20
climatological "normals" to date. This higher number represents a =
two-percent=20
increase over "normal". Interestingly, scientists at the National =
Climatic Data=20
Center recently reported that the summer of 2009 (June through August) =
was the=20
33rd coldest summer nationwide since records began in 1895, with many of =
the=20
states across the nation's midsection experiencing below to much below =
normal=20
summer temperatures, while the West Coast and Gulf Coast States had =
above normal=20
statewide temperatures. Not surprisingly, the East and West Central =
States had=20
between 24 and 26-percent fewer cooling degree-day units, reflective of =
below=20
average summer temperatures, while the Pacific Coast States had a =
24-percent=20
greater number of cooling degree days, corresponding to the persistent =
heat=20
experienced there. When compared with the 2008 cooling season, most =
sections of=20
the nation experiencing fewer cooling degree days in the 2009 season to =
date,=20
with the nationwide average for this cooling season to date experiencing =
a=20
three-percent decrease from the 2008 season. </P>
<P>How these cooling degree statistics translate into a change in the =
cost of=20
your utility bill is not as clear-cut as the cost relationship with the=20
cumulative heating degree-day units. Other factors, such as the =
atmospheric=20
humidity levels, the amount of sunshine and your life style may also=20
significantly influence your decision to run your air conditioner. </P>
<HR>

<P><I>Return to the <A=20
href=3D"http://www.ametsoc.org/amsedu/online/archive/course/09_fall/f09w0=
4w_sum.html">Wednesday=20
Daily Weather Summary </A></I></P>
<ADDRESS>Prepared by Edward J. Hopkins, Ph.D., email <A=20
href=3D"mailto:hopkins@meteor.wisc.edu">hopkins@meteor.wisc.edu</A> =
<BR>=A9=20
Copyright, 2009, The American Meteorological Society. =
</ADDRESS></BODY></HTML>
