In what ways do the goals and methods of artistic and scientific research differ? [2]

Methods for generating data
In order to observe phenomena as objectively as possible, scientist utilize standardized techniques and approaches which have been established empirically. Their methods are logical in character and can be replicated by other scientists.

The artist's methods for generating materials for his works are non-standard. Observational techniques and what artists will respond to are idiosyncratic and are often dependent upon the artist's frame of mind. Rather than being logical in character, the methods used by artists for generating data are expressive; e.g., creating accidental colors when spreading paint, or attending to and distorting particular facial features or a spatial field.

Forms for reporting data
Scientists utilize a variety of devices for reporting the nature and findings of their research; e.g., graphs, pie and bar charts, etc. There are standardized methods for describing data and even standardized writing styles for reporting one's findings. These standardized approaches are essential to communicating objectively, efficiently and effectively the results of research activities.

For the artist, who is expressing personal reactions to experience, standardization is anathema. In addition, the particular form that is employed is inseparable from the content of what is being expressed. For example, a symmetrical and static organization of visual elements impacts differently upon what is ultimately expressed than would an asymmetrical and dynamic arrangement.